Network-AI
Workflow

Every Workflow Needs a Terminal State That Humans Can Read

Published 2026-09-09 | Terminal states

Workflows should end in states that tell a human what happened and what, if anything, is still owed, because ended and finished are not the same thing.

A workflow that simply stops leaves a question behind. A workflow that ends in a named terminal state leaves an answer, even when the answer is that a human owes it attention.

What a terminal state should say

  • Whether the intended effect happened, partially happened, or did not.
  • What cleanup or follow-up remains, with an owner.
  • Which evidence to consult if the outcome is disputed.

Use the architecture guide, blackboard schema, and examples to give every workflow an ending a human can act on.

Continue evaluating

End workflows in plain language.

Use the architecture, blackboard schema, and examples docs to design terminal states that say what happened and what remains owed.

Architecture Blackboard schema Examples